February 28, 2021

Experts in regulating OTT content in India are divided – Latest News

New Delhi: As calls for regulation of content displayed on OTT sites grow louder and the government is said to be exploring regulations abroad, experts have warned that the pros and cons of such measures should be properly assessed beforehand.

Thandav, Mirzapur 2, A.K. The latest calls for OTT regulations come after controversies such as VS AK and A Suitable Boy.

Although Thandav and a suitable guy attracted the anger of some for insulting religious sentiments, Anil Kapoor wore the wrong uniform to A.K. The Indian Air Force was not very happy about the misuse of language in Vs AK.

The producer of Mirzapur 2 and the streaming site Amazon Prime, the web series faces charges of hurting religious, social and regional sentiments and damaging social harmony.

Pawan Tukal, one of the country’s top cyber legal experts, said there was a need for rules of commitment for video streaming players.

“OTT is a unique animal,” he said, sharing the features of an intermediary and not an intermediary at the same time.

“OTTs are eligible to act as intermediaries under Section 2 (1) (w) of the Information Technology Act 2000 if they handle third party data,” Tukal told IANS.

Intermediaries are not responsible for the content published on the Platform and are generally subject to the rules set by the Sites.

“But OTTs also have their own content. So the same law firm shares the features of an intermediary, while not being an intermediary,” Tuckle said.

However, leading technology policy and media consultant Prasando K. According to Roy, the idea of ​​regulating streaming content provided on the Internet flies against the idea of ​​the Internet.

“When content is accessed directly over the Internet (even through subscriptions), it makes no sense to impose any audit approval on a particle distribution channel.”

“If this censorship were extended to the Internet, imagine the problems for the largest global sites, especially YouTube, which has a wide range of content, some of which are age-restricted, some are geographically prohibited – but most of which are user-uploaded: 300 hours of video uploaded every minute, every day. Billions of videos are being watched, “he said.

The worst thing is that self-regulation is “worse than heavy government regulation” because it is imposed on content creators with caution and discipline, defined and guided by a few.

He said self-control can hinder creativity and affect the quality of shows.

“It’s already going on in the film industry, from doing pixel wine and beer in some movies, to trying to expect any character, dialogue or storyline to offend a frontier group going to court,” Roy said.

“This will lead to repeated auto-downgrading of user-generated content by sites that want to be compliant. Already, some sites and makers have” self-regulation “;

However, Roy said it was important for the government to ignore the standards set by “under-listers of Internet freedom” such as Russia or China.